Held as belief, not theorem. The premise set is deliberately minimal: an agent, a journey event, and one property — vastness — carried by the event rather than the agent. The consequent assigns meaning to the event, not to the agent, and that asymmetry is the position: Vast Mountain claims that when scale exceeds the traveller, significance relocates from the destination to the traversal itself. The record's counterpart, Desolate Mountain, keeps its consequent on the agent (the journey tests *them*); the pair thus encodes two directions of the same encounter — full pole: the journey gains meaning; empty pole: the traveller is tried. A challenger has two natural doors: argue that vastness belongs on a terrain entity rather than the event (a reification question), or argue that "the journey is the meaning" smuggles a valuation no premise supplies. Either challenge, if it lands, rewrites the premise set and bumps this record's revision — which is exactly how it should go.